Recall EDHCSD Board of Directors

Help us restore accountability, transparency, and public trust.

Let your Voice Be Heard- No Irresponsible Board

Vote to Recall Irresponsible Directors RECALLEDH@GMAIL.COM

The Community Deserves Better

Reasons For Recall

For being complicit in squandering millions of taxpayer dollars through poor decision-making, approval of retaliatory and improper litigation, promotion of personal agendas, and derelictions of duty; overpaying $10 million for land valued at $1.5 million; disregarding voters rights, refusing to implement Measures Q, R, and S in violation of California Election Code and Constitutional provisions; benefiting a developer by releasing them from an obligation to build a $13 million park at Bass Lake; receiving Park Impact Fees while disregarding a commitment to develop the 30-acre Carson Creek park; misusing public funds to sue El Dorado County Auditor and Controller to force release of illegitimate LLAD tax assessments; failing to take action against the conflict of interest of former CSD General Manager and contracted assessment engineer DTA; neglecting performance of duty by failing to call to order multiple scheduled public meetings and to fill the alleged vacancy in the Board of Directors thereby surrendering the appointment authority to the County Board of Supervisors; approving inaccurate, incomplete responses to 2024 Grand Jury reports, undermining transparency and accountability; engaging in violations of the Brown Act; and other personal and professional actions that justify recall from office.

Reckless Behavior

In 2020, CSD Directors Mattock and Martinelli approved an agreement with a developer that resulted in a significant financial loss for El Dorado Hills taxpayers. The developer was originally obligated to construct a turnkey community park valued at $13 million. However, instead of ensuring the developer fulfilled this responsibility, Mattock and Martinelli agreed to accept only $3.5 million in lieu of the completed park.

As a result, the El Dorado Hills Community Services District (EDHCSD) is now responsible for covering the full cost of building the park — an estimated $13million — placing the burden entirely on taxpayers. This decision reflects poor fiscal oversight and a failure to protect the community’s financial interests.

Directors' Personal Agendas and Reckless Actions Cost Us $ Millions

CSD Directors approved excessive bonuses and pay raises for former General Manager Kevin Loewen while Mr. Loewen was involved in egregious financial misconduct. Directors also approved overpaying $8 million for the Old Executive Golf Course, which had a CSD-owned appraisal valuing it at $1.47 million. I believe it is right and fair for the community to be aware of the following. Decide for yourself whether to make your voice heard! If you do not agree with the Board’s plan to overpay $9 million for the second parcel of the Old Executive Golf Course—especially after $5.5 million lost in the Austin lawsuit and ongoing costs in two other lawsuits—now is the time to speak up.

Denying the Democratic Process and Hypocrisy

All three El Dorado Hills ballot initiatives to repeal and refund CSD LLAD assessments were overwhelmingly approved by votes of the impacted districts. This sends a clear message about unjustified taxation and the ability of people to make a change. The results are:

· Measure Q – Promontory LLAD #22 – 80.61% YES

· Measure R – Valley View (Blackstone) LLAD #33 – 72.49% YES

· Measure S – Carson Creek (Heritage) LLAD #39 – 91.91% YES.

The El Dorado Hills Community Services District (EDHCSD) Board has refused to acknowledge and accept the lawful and certified results of the 2024 General Election regarding Measures Q, R, and S—which were passed by voters to repeal and refund special assessments that

were unfairly administered and mismanaged.

Once the Measures were certified by the El Dorado County Elections Office and approved by the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors, they became law. However, instead of respecting the will of the voters, the EDHCSD Board has spent tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars is an attempt to overturn a lawful election.

This blatant disregard for democracy mirrors the Austin's lawsuit, in which EDHCSD lost $5.5 million due to its reckless legal actions. Has the Board not learned its lesson? The Board’s ongoing efforts to deny a certified election are not only unethical but also a direct violation of the public trust. The residents of El Dorado Hills deserve leadership that upholds the law—not one that wastes public funds to fight against it.

EDHCSD Board’s Hypocrisy: Ignoring Voters When It Suits Them The El Dorado Hills Community Services District (EDHCSD) Board, particularly Directors Noelle Mattock and Michael Martinelli, have demonstrated a blatant disregard for their sworn duties and the will of the voters. Their actions regarding the replacement of Director Chuck King and their handling of Measures Q, R, and S expose a staggering level of hypocrisy.

Selective Democracy: When It’s Convenient for Them When Chuck King resigned, the Board had the authority—and responsibility—to appoint a replacement. Instead, Mattock and Martinelli refused, insisting that they could not override the will of the voters. This forced a costly special election, wasting $75,000 of taxpayer money. However, when Measures Q, R, and S passed by an overwhelming majority, Mattock and Martinelli suddenly abandoned their commitment to voter intent. Rather than respecting the clear mandate from residents, they hired corporate attorneys to justify their refusal to accept the election results. So much for respecting democracy.

Cityhood: Silencing the Voters Perhaps the most egregious move was allowing the cityhood process to bypass the petition phase entirely, meaning residents were denied their rightful opportunity to voice their opinions before the issue moved forward. While the Board obstructed the repeal of unnecessary taxes through Measures Q, R, and S, they facilitated a process that could lead to higher taxes and greater government overreach without giving voters a choice.

Time for Accountability Residents of El Dorado Hills should not tolerate elected officials who pick and choose when to honor democracy. Mattock, and Martinelli’s actions show they are not working for the people—they are working for their own interests. It’s time to hold them accountable for their hypocrisy and fiscal irresponsibility.

Faulty and Risky Behavior

Ignoring the Community and Disconnected

The mismanagement and misplaced priorities of Directors Ferry, Mattock, and Martinelli continue to justify the community’s efforts to recall them. Below are new critical concerns that further highlight their failure to act in the best interests of El Dorado Hills residents.

1. Director Ferry’s Obsession with Cityhood at the Expense of Critical Issues

Director Ferry is more focused on cityhood than addressing urgent issues facing the CSD.
Instead of prioritizing financial accountability, recreational services, or park development. Ferry has redirected efforts and resources toward cityhood initiatives, despite significant opposition from residents.

2. Obstruction of the Forensic Audit – Delaying Recovery of $3 Million in Lost Funds

The EDHCSD Board initiated a forensic audit to investigate the alleged mismanagement of funds involving DTA (David Taussig & Associates) and Former General Manager Kevin Loewen.
If handled properly and in a timely manner, the CSD could recover over $3 million in taxpayer funds.
Instead, Ferry has allowed the audit to be sidetracked, delaying accountability and risking the loss of these funds.
This is a time-sensitive issue, and further delays could prevent the community from recovering money that rightfully belongs to the taxpayers.

3. Wasting $75,000+ in Taxpayer Funds on an Unnecessary Special Election

Directors Mattock and Martinelli refused to appoint a replacement for former Director Chuck King’s seat, despite having the authority to do so.
Instead, they forced a special election, costing taxpayers over $75,000—a completely avoidable expense.
This decision was politically motivated and fiscally irresponsible, as an appointment could have been made at no additional cost to taxpayers.

4. Director Ferry’s Proposal to Increase Chamber of Commerce Funding While Cutting Recreational Programs

Ferry proposed increasing the Chamber of Commerce’s funding from $1,200 to $10,000—a more than 800% increase—as part of his cityhood push.
At the same time, he has supported reducing funding for recreational programs, which directly impacts families and youth in the community.
This clearly demonstrates misplaced priorities, favoring cityhood advocacy over the well-being of local residents..

Backdoor Deals

The Secret Deal for a Hotel Resort

In December 2023, the EDHCSD Board willfully engaged in a secret backdoor deal with a hotel resort developer regarding plans for the purchase of the Old Executive Golf Course.

🚨 The Problem?

This action was unlawful—EDHCSD does not have the legal authority to engage in economic development.
The CSD's primary function is to manage public park services, not to broker land deals for commercial ventures of hotel development.

LAFCO’s Contradictory Position

On August 26, 2024, when this unauthorized economic development activity was reported to the El Dorado Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), their Executive Officer initially sidestepped the issue, stating:

“The EDHCSD’s legal authority is best determined by the EDHCSD’s legal counsel. The CSD and their counsel can make an educated decision on their authority and the projects that they are pursuing.”

Now, in an email dated March 25, 2025, the same LAFCO Executive Officer has pivoted, clearly stating:

“Economic Development is not one of EDHCSD’s chartered powers.”

Why the Sudden Change?

A major question arises: What caused this shift in LAFCO’s position?

❓ Could it be because EDHCSD is now paying LAFCO significant fees to assist in incorporation efforts?

Recall EDHCSD Board of Directors